Home : Smartphones

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A52: Which to Pick?

author Luis Silva (June 2021 Updated: March 2022 - 6 min. reading time)

The price of the Mi 10 Lite isn't that much higher, but it isn't the best of the two.

It has better performance (+22%). But the Galaxy A52 adds more OS updates (3 additional years), more internal storage (128GB vs. 64GB), and external storage.

Are there other things worth mentioning?

With the Mi 10 Lite, you'll also get more RAM (6GB vs. 4GB) and Bluetooth 5.1. But the Galaxy A52 also features a higher refresh rate display, better peak brightness, and optical image stabilization.

How much more will the Galaxy A52 cost me?

If you're going off-contract, it'll most likely cost you (up to about $19) less. So you should really look into it.

Is it worth getting the Mi 10 Lite in 2022?

The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite is clearly worth buying in 2022, even if there are better phones out there. Sure, you can take a peek at other devices like the Galaxy Note 10 Lite, but we should praise it because it features good battery life.

Is it worth buying the Galaxy A52 in 2022?

If you like Samsung, the Galaxy A52 is a pretty solid choice, even in 2022. I like its good battery life and tons of storage. But don't just ignore the Galaxy A71.

Keep reading to learn more about what sets them apart, how they fare against their competition, and how the industry is scoring their specs.

Check prices on Amazon Check prices on Amazon
Click here or scroll down to check prices on eBay, BestBuy, and Walmart.

I earn a small fee from qualifying purchases. It doesn't affect the price you pay nor my opinions.

Xiaomi Mi 10 LiteSamsung Galaxy A52

CONTENTS

Click on one of these
shortcuts and then tap
"back" to return here

Introduction

In March of 2021, Samsung launched its Galaxy A52. The Mi 10 Lite, however, saw the light of day in May 2020.

We've run down the specs, design, price, and much more in this guide to help you choose between the Mi 10 Lite and the Galaxy A52.

The weight of each section

For additional information regarding our smartphone comparisons, check this FAQ.

to check who their rivals are.

Price*
vs.
Device Mi 10 Lite Galaxy A52
Release Date 2020, May 2021, March 1y.
OS Updates 1 year 3 years 2y.
Security Updates 4 years 4 years 0y.

*Reference: 100: Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max.

Which One Has The Best Performance?

Performance-wise, Geekbench 5 scores the Mi 10 Lite 22% ahead in the multi-core ranking. If you're a heavy gamer, think about this. If not, then it isn't a big deal.

You're not looking for the slowest phone around, right? The Galaxy A52 is clearly under the average if you consider related-priced phones. The average score is 2166, but it got 1577.

By the way, you can define the Mi 10 Lite as an upper mid-range and the Galaxy A52 as a mid-range device.

Performance*
vs.
Features Mi 10 Lite Galaxy A52
SoC Snapdragon 765 Snapdragon 720
Graphics Adreno 620 Adreno 618
Geekbench 5 Score 1927
1577
-350
OS Android 10 and MIUI 12 Android 11 and OneUI
Tek-Score
5.1
4.5
-0.6

*Reference: 100: Apple iPhone 13.

Which Phone Has The Best Display?

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite front transparent png Samsung Galaxy A52 front transparent png

The Galaxy A52 has a better display, but the Mi 10 Lite is just as good.

Bearing in mind the Mi 10 Lite, 93% of its rivals have an AMOLED screen.

Concerning the Galaxy A52, please be aware that just like its competitor, 76% of its rivals can play HDR content and have an Always-On display, and 93% have an AMOLED screen.

Display Density (DPIs)*
vs.
Features Mi 10 Lite Galaxy A52
Size 6.5
6.5
0.0
Screen Type AMOLED AMOLED
Resolution (px) 1080x2400
1080x2400
0
Refresh Rate 60hz 90hz 30
Dots per Inch 404.89
404.89
0.00
Always-On-Display Yes Yes
Notch Teardrop Hole
Peak Brightness 610 nits
794 nits
184
HDR HDR10+ -
Sub Tek-Score
7.9
8.7
0.8
Protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Tek-Score
6.4
6.7
0.3

*Reference: 100: Sony Xperia 1 II.

Which Phone Has The Best Cameras?

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite back transparent png Samsung Galaxy A52 back transparent png

Overall, You shouldn't be seeing any difference between these cameras.

About the Mi 10 Lite: I'm expecting a review from DXOMARK anytime now, and I'm confident that they'll give it close to 112* points. And if you take into account its wide-angle lens, you'll end up with a score of 125**.

Last (but not least), you should know that all of its rivals can record videos in 4K or more and have an ultra-wide-angle lens.

About the Galaxy A52: The guys over at the DXOMARK labs scored this camera with 107 points. Plus, combining with its wide-angle lens, that score goes up to 117. If you want to know more about every tidbit, check it here.

PS: This Dxo score is for the 5G version, but this version should be close enough.

Winding it up, just so you know, 97% of its rivals can record videos in 4 or 8K, and all have an ultra-wide-angle lens.

Considering this score, we can classify the Mi 10 Lite more as a lower high-end while the Galaxy A52 leans towards the upper mid-range.

A telephoto lens would've been a great addition. If you agree with me, you better wrap it up and start looking for other devices like the Galaxy Note 10 Lite or the Galaxy A72.

*DXOMARK is a world-known reference in the camera benchmarking department. I'd love to see more tests, but some phones are just left out. So when I get my hands on one of them, I consider every camera spec and give an approximated score. This score should have a topmost discrepancy of 2 points.

**This score still needs improvement, especially with cameras with less than 40MP and no telephoto lens. They moved to a new camera test protocol, and I need more reviewed devices to fine-tune older scores.

Picture Quality*
vs.
Primary Camera Mi 10 Lite Galaxy A52
Megapixels 48
64
16
Aperture 1.8
1.8
0.0
Lens 26mm
26mm
0
Lens Type Wide-Angle Wide-Angle
Flash 2 1 -1
HDR Yes Yes
OIS No Yes
Video 2160 2160 0
Score 125
117
-8

*Reference: 100: Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra.

Extra Camera(s) Mi 10 Lite Galaxy A52 vs.
Megapixels 8
12
4
Aperture 2.2
2.2
0.0
Lens 15mm 13mm -2
Lens Type Ultra-wide-Angle Ultra-wide-Angle
Megapixels 2 5 3
Aperture 2.4 2.4 0.0
Megapixels 2 5 3
Aperture 2.4 2.4 0.0
Lens Type Depth Sensor Depth Sensor
Score 13 10 -3
Selfie Camera Mi 10 Lite Galaxy A52 vs.
Megapixels 16
32
16
Aperture 2.5
2.2
-0.3
Lens - 26mm
Mi 10 Lite Galaxy A52 vs.
Tek-Score
7.4
6.9
-0.5

Who has the best frame?

None of them stands out, so any will do.

Both also have about the same weight: 189 g. (6.67 oz). If you're curious, the "weight to display size" score of the Mi 10 Lite is 4.8, which suggests it has an acceptable score for a 6.5 inches display. Having said that, the Galaxy A52 has 5.2, so nothing to state here.

If you're looking for some kind of waterproof phone, perhaps you should also consider the Galaxy A72.

Looks*
vs.
Body Mi 10 Lite Galaxy A52
Size 163 x 74 x 7 mm
(5.75 x 2.61 x 0.25 in)
159 x 75 x 8 mm
(5.61 x 2.65 x 0.28 in)
10966
Weight 192 g. (6.77 oz)
189 g. (6.67 oz)
-3
Build Front glass Front glass
Colors Aurora Blue, Dream White, and Cosmic Gray Awesome Black, Awesome Violet, Awesome White, and Awesome Blue
Screen To Body Ratio 84.57%
85.54%
0.97
Disp.Size To Weight Score 4.8 5.2 0.3
Looks 5.2/10
6.3/10
1.1
Waterproof - -
Biometrics Under Display Fingerprint Under Display Fingerprint
Tek-Score
1.5
1.8
0.3

*100% = 4+ colors + front and back glass + S2BR: 86+%.

Which has the best battery?

The Mi 10 Lite does have a smaller battery, with 4160 mAh, while the Galaxy A52 has 4500 mAh. But GSMArena did test them out, and the Mi 10 Lite does have an advantage here.

For your information, the Mi 10 Lite also doesn't have many rivals at any given price range. Let's see if it still has a place on our top 10 list with the best battery life.

Battery*
vs.
Features Mi 10 Lite Galaxy A52
Capacity (mAh) 4160 4500 340
1h Talk + 1h Web + 1h Video 85% left
83% left
-2
1h Talk + 3h Web + 1h Video 72% left
70% left
-2
1h Talk + 1h Web + 3h Video 76% left
69% left
-7
Bat. To Phone Size Score 3.9 3.6 -0.3
Sub Tek-Score
7.8
7.4
-0.4
Fast Charging 20w
25w
5
Wireless Charging No No 0
Tek-Score
6.6
6.4
-0.3

*Reference: 90: Samsung Galaxy A42.

Which has more storage?

The Galaxy A52 has about two times more storage.

Xiaomi put 6GB of RAM and 64GB of built-in storage on the Mi 10 Lite. Furthermore, other devices from this budget usually have more storage and more RAM. They average at 6GB of RAM and 119Gb of storage.

On the Galaxy A52, you'll find 128GB of internal storage and 4GB of RAM. Again, you'll get more RAM but less storage by picking any rival at that price range. 6Gb for RAM and 113Gb for storage, on average.

Most people should be OK with their internal storage. However, if you love to store 4k videos, you'll find out that 64 GB won't be enough for you.

Storage*
vs.
Features Mi 10 Lite Galaxy A52
RAM (GB) 6GB
4GB
-2
Internal (GB) 64GB
128GB
64
Micro SD No microSDXC (shared slot)
Tek-Score
2.8
7.5
4.8

*Internal Storage + 256GB Memory Card (Max: 512GB).

Which is the most connectivity-friendly?

The Mi 10 Lite is your better option, as it features Bluetooth 5.1 and 5G.

You can find the Galaxy A52 in the LTE or (LTE and) 5G variants. The 5G variant of the Galaxy A52 has a 120hz display, an Adreno 619, a Snapdragon 750G, and 6GB of RAM.

Connectivity
vs.
Features Mi 10 Lite Galaxy A52
Network 5G LTE (also available in 5G)
Bluetooth 5.1
5.0
NFC Yes Yes (market dependent)
3.5mm jack Yes Yes
Tek-Score
10.0
8.5
-1.5

Which is more affordable?

Here's what we've found out:

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite

Reference: $399

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite

Samsung Galaxy A52

Reference: $380

Samsung Galaxy A52

I earn a small fee from qualifying purchases. It doesn't affect the price you pay nor my opinions, but it will mean a lot if you click on one of these buttons before purchasing your next phone (or whatever else you end up buying). You'll be helping to take this to the next level.

Prices on eBay are in $US but Europe-based. You can click to check the prices in your country.

Prices marked with ! are from renewed/refurbished/carrier-locked phones (except eBay prices that, as a last resort, can be from bids or used devices).

How much of a "phone" can your money buy?
That's how much "score" you can get with $100 based on the global score that you'll see in the next section (higher is better).

Have you found better prices elsewhere? The formula is simple: score/price*100.

Value for money Mi 10 Lite Galaxy A52 VS
Amazon 1.37 - -
eBay - 1.65 -
Best Buy - - -
Walmart - - -

Also, don't forget to check the latest deals from these four stores, and the state of the art on mobile technology, if you don't want to overpay on your next smartphone.


Related articles:


Best smartphone deals


The Best Unbiased Smartphones For All Budgets


Smartphone Specs Statistics: The State Of The Art (Q1 2021)

Want to know about that global score? Just so you have an idea, take a look at where its adversaries average. The Mi 10 Lite class is at 6.1, and the Galaxy A52 6.0.

Verdict: What Makes the Samsung Galaxy A52 Stand Out?

What can the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite give you that the Samsung Galaxy A52 can't:

- Better performance (+22%)

- More RAM (6GB vs. 4GB)

- Bluetooth 5.1

What can the Samsung Galaxy A52 give you that the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite can't:

- Better peak brightness

- Higher refresh rates

- OIS

- More OS updates (3 additional years)

- More internal storage (128GB vs. 64GB)

- External storage

Pros Mi 10 Lite Galaxy A52
#1 AMOLED AMOLED
#2 Always-On-Display Always-On-Display
#3 Cameras Cameras
#4 Battery Life Battery Life
#5 Fast Charging Fast Charging
#6 3.5mm Jack MicroSD Slot
#7 3.5mm Jack
Cons Mi 10 Lite Galaxy A52
#1 Wireless Charging Wireless Charging
#2 MicroSD Slot Weight
#3 Weight
#4 Price
Relative Score*
vs.
Global Score Mi 10 Lite Galaxy A52
Gaming Score
5.8
5.3
-0.5
Tek-Score
5.45
6.19
0.74
Your Score

*Reference: 100: Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra.

Scroll the sliders down below to get your own personalized score. Let's suppose you value performance and battery life, and you don't really care about anything else. Then, just set the "Performance" and the "Battery" sliders up to 5 (5+5=10), and then the other sliders down to 0. You'll know what's the best phone for you.

Performance 1.9
Display 1.7
Cameras 1.4
Frame 0.9
Battery 1.9
Storage 2.0
Connectivity 0.4
Total Should be 10 or as close as possible: 9.6

For suggestions and bug reports, click here. Your help is appreciated. Thank you.

If you want to know more about them, click here:

About me

Hello!

My name is Luis Silva, and I have a degree in computer management. Ever since I was a teenager, I've loved everything to do with tech. Music, pictures, video editing, I've done it all! This site is a place for me to share some of the knowledge I have, as well as keep up-to-date with current trends. This is a wonderful place for tech-geeks and everyone else that just want to learn more about tech and smartphones in general.


Keep in touch


pinterest logo Follow us on Pinterest

facebook logo Join our Facebook group







No spam, I promise. You can unsubscribe at any time and I'll never share your email without your permission.



Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite Related Comparisons


Samsung Galaxy A52 Related Comparisons

×

"Display size to phone weight" ratio explained

This indeed is a "display size to phone weight" ratio, but because every phone ended up somewhere between 0.0272 and 0.0421, I've amplified (adapted) those values so they would fit in a 0-10 scale. As of now, the best smartphone is the Samsung Galaxy A40, with 140g. (4.94 oz) for a 5.9 inch display. It got a score of 9.92. While the worse device is the iPhone 8 Plus, which weighs 202 g. (7.13 oz) and has a 5.5-inch display. It ended up with a score of 0.75.

Please, be aware that this score is subject to change if and when a new smartphone comes along that ends up being outside of this scale.

×

"Battery to device size" ratio explained

This score should give you an idea about the energy footprint of the devices you're considering. It reflects not only the hardware and the energy that it requires but also the amount of energy that the battery can deliver.

The major spenders on any device should be the display and the SoC. But everything from a notification led to its modems need to be optimized, or else, the OEM should simply include a bigger battery as a compensation. Unfortunately, it isn't always possible due to size limitations. But in the end, if a particular OEM can do a good job and give you excellent battery life on a small device, so should everyone else. That's why I've added a "battery to device size" ratio. But since the real scale went from 119 (for the Galaxy S10e, Snapdragon variant) and up to 164 (for the iPhone 7 Plus), I've decided to convert them so they would fit in a 0-10 scale, being 0 the worst device, (the iPhone 7 Plus) and 10 the one every OEM should look up to.

As an example, Apple did an excellent job on the iPhone 7. It has a score of 8. Despite having a small capacity, the hardware is well optimized, and it still gives you decent battery life considering its size. The iPhone 7 Plus, on the other hand, with those bezels shrinking its display size, clearly could've been the #1 in our top 10 list of best battery devices if Apple simply filled all that empty space with a bigger battery.

As a side note: I haven't included the dept of the devices in this formula because even if a device ended up being 1mm/0.03 inches thicker, it wouldn't matter that much to those who really value battery life.

Please, be aware that this score is subject to change if and when a new smartphone comes along that ends up being outside of this scale.

×

Rivals

As of now, these are the rivals that were considered for each of them. They may change every time its prices are updated.

These are the lowest prices found on Amazon, eBay, BestBuy, and Walmart.


 Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A71
    $400
  • ApplerivaliPhone 8
    $370
  • ApplerivaliPhone XR
    $392
  • OnePlusrival7
    $388
  • XiaomirivalMi 9T Pro
    $385
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy Note 8
    $424
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy Note 10+
    $413
  • ApplerivaliPhone 8 Plus
    $390
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S10e
    $428
  • ApplerivaliPhone XS
    $410
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy Note 10
    $424
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S20+ EX
    $389
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S10 EX
    $429
  • OnePlusrival7 Pro
    $429
  • HuaweirivalP30
    $400
  • GooglerivalPixel 4
    $398
  • GooglerivalPixel 4 XL
    $349
  • OnePlusrival6T
    $349
  • HuaweirivalMate 20 Pro
    $436
  • XiaomirivalMi 9
    $400
  • ApplerivaliPhone SE 2
    $360
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy Note 10 Lite
    $425
  • OnePlusrivalNord
    $410
  • GooglerivalPixel 4a
    $350
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy M51
    $396
  • XiaomirivalMi 10T Lite
    $325
  • XiaomirivalMi 11 Lite
    $349
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A52
    $375
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A72
    $445
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A42
    $349
  • XiaomirivalMi 9t Pro
    $385
  • OnePlusrivalNord 2
    $440

 Samsung Galaxy A52 
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A71
    $400
  • ApplerivaliPhone 8
    $370
  • ApplerivaliPhone XR
    $392
  • OnePlusrival7
    $388
  • XiaomirivalMi 9T Pro
    $385
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy Note 8
    $424
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy Note 10+
    $413
  • ApplerivaliPhone 8 Plus
    $390
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S10e
    $428
  • ApplerivaliPhone XS
    $410
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy Note 10
    $424
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S20+ EX
    $389
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S10 EX
    $429
  • OnePlusrival7 Pro
    $429
  • HuaweirivalP30
    $400
  • GooglerivalPixel 4
    $398
  • GooglerivalPixel 4 XL
    $349
  • OnePlusrival6T
    $349
  • HuaweirivalMate 20 Pro
    $436
  • XiaomirivalMi 9
    $400
  • XiaomirivalMi 9 Lite
    $317
  • ApplerivaliPhone SE 2
    $360
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy Note 10 Lite
    $425
  • OnePlusrivalNord
    $410
  • GooglerivalPixel 4a
    $350
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy M51
    $396
  • XiaomirivalMi 10T Lite
    $325
  • XiaomirivalMi 10 Lite
    $399
  • XiaomirivalMi 11 Lite
    $349
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A32
    $319
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A72
    $445
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A42
    $349
  • XiaomirivalMi 9t Pro
    $385
  • OnePlusrivalNord 2
    $440
×

Formula deviation

Since the guys at DxoMark don't review every camera out there, I've come up with a formula based on the ones that they do rate, so I could get an equivalent score for the ones they don't review. After testing it against these cameras, I got the deviation between that and their DxO score.

Device: DxOScore Deviation
Samsung Galaxy A50: 88 -1
Apple iPhone XR: 104 1
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro: 108 -7
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro: 87 1
Sony Xperia 1: 99 -1
Sony Xperia 5: 101 1
Samsung Galaxy Note 8: 100 0
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus: 126 2
Apple iPhone 8 Plus: 96 -3
Xiaomi Pocophone F1: 92 -1
Apple iPhone 7 Plus: 90 -1
Apple iPhone X: 101 3
Apple iPhone 11: 112 -1
Samsung Galaxy Note 8: 100 0
Samsung Galaxy Note 9: 107 1
Apple iPhone XS Max: 110 -2
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max: 124 1
Samsung Galaxy S10: 124 2
Apple iPhone XS: 110 -1
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus: 120 -2
OnePlus 7 Pro: 122 0
OnePlus 7T Pro: 122 0
Huawei P30 Pro: 125 -1
Google Pixel 4: 117 0
Google Pixel 3: 103 0
Google Pixel 2: 100 0
Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus: 127 -2
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra: 132 2
OnePlus 6: 100 0
OnePlus 6T: 101 1
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus: 105 -1
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: 120 0
Xiaomi Mi 9: 115 0
Huawei Mate 30 Pro: 132 0
Huawei P40 Pro: 140 -1
Apple iPhone SE 2: 101 0
OnePlus 8 Pro: 126 0
Xiaomi Mi 8: 105 1
Samsung Galaxy A71: 89 1
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro: 134 0

As you can see, most cameras sit between 1 and -1, while a few of them go up to 2 or -2. That means it's reasonable to assume other similar cameras that they don't review to, in the worst-case scenario, be anywhere from -2 to 2 points from the score that the formula gets.

For example: Given that the Pixel 4 got 117 points and that the Pixel 4 XL share the same year and camera specs, it's reasonable to expect a score of 117 too. But in reality, if they do review that camera, it may end up anywhere between 115 and 119.

Be aware that at DxO, they give a score based on their opinion, not based on any formula. That's why I think there's an odd difference of 6 points between the iPhone 8 Plus and the iPhone X. In theory, they should have the same camera.

I'm guessing that the Mi 9T Pro got a deviation of 7 points because they tested its Chinese variant (the K20 Pro).

Update: They just changed their protocol to include preview image evaluation and trustability. I'm keeping the old table (for now) for reference purposes, and I'll be adding a new one as soon as they review at least a couple of new mclass-range cameras.

You can expect the same (or a bit bigger) deviation for high-end cameras, but anything with a score below 100-110 should be taken with a grain of salt.

This is valid for all cameras tested with the previous protocol. For those that they dclassn't test, the deviation may be up to twice as much.

×

About GeekBench 5

This is just a quick note to let you know that, if, by any chance, the smartphone you're looking for isn't on the GeekBench site yet, you can check on GsmArena.com, as they also usually test smartphones with that benchmark tool.



Top 10 Smartphones