The 9 Pro is a little bit more expensive, but it isn't the best of the two.
The Galaxy S21 Plus features better glass protection, a better display, and better battery life.
The 9 Pro gives you a telephoto lens (+48 mm), faster-charging speeds (65w vs. 25w), faster wireless charging (50w vs. 15w), and Bluetooth 5.2.
Keep in mind that these are both great devices as they achieved a pretty even score.
If you're not considering subscribing to a service provider, you can be saving up to around $71, so think about it.
You shouldn't ignore the Samsung Galaxy S21 Plus at all, even in 2022. Of course, you'll also be happy with a device like the Vivo X60 Pro, but we should praise it because it features good performance, good battery life, excellent glass protection, and 8K recordings.
Of course, I still recommend the 9 Pro in 2022. You'll love it for its good performance, good battery life, fast charging, fast wireless charging, and a great display. It doesn't mean you can't take a quick peek at (again) the Vivo X60 Pro, though.
Just keep reading if you want to know everything about them, how they differ from their competition, and you'll know how the tech experts evaluate their specs.
Check prices on Amazon Check prices on AmazonI earn a small fee from qualifying purchases. It doesn't affect the price you pay nor my opinions.
CONTENTS
Click on one of these
shortcuts and then tap
"back" to return here
While OnePlus's 9 Pro hit stores in March 2021, Samsung's Galaxy S21 Plus went on sale in January 2021.
Here you can look at the Galaxy S21 Plus and the 9 Pro, compare each other's features, and decide which one is best for you. Let us delve into the finer details.
For additional information regarding our smartphone comparisons, check this FAQ.
to check who their rivals are.
Price* | vs. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Device | ![]() |
![]() |
|
Release Date | 2021, January | 2021, March | 0y. |
OS Updates | 3 years | 2 years | -1y. |
Security Updates | 4 years | 3 years | -1y. |
*Reference: 100: Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max.
Geekbench 5 scores the 9 Pro 10% ahead of its rival in the multi-core ranking. All in all, there's not much of a difference between the two.
We can label both of them as high-end.
Performance* | vs. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Features | ![]() |
![]() |
|
SoC | Exynos 2100 | Snapdragon 888 | |
Graphics | Mali-G78 MP14 | Adreno 660 | |
Geekbench 5 Score | 3113 | 3427 | 314 |
OS | Android 11 and OneUI | Android 11 and OxygenOS 11 | |
Tek-Score | 0.5 |
*Reference: 100: Apple iPhone 13.
![]() |
![]() |
---|
The 9 Pro is the title-holder here, and it wins by a significant margin. But the glass on the Galaxy S21 Plus is much rougher.
Considering the Galaxy S21 Plus, you should know that 84% of its rivals can play HDR content and have an Always-On display, and all have an AMOLED screen.
Compared to the 9 Pro, as a reference, 96% of its rivals can play HDR content. Plus, all have an AMOLED screen, and 83% have an Always-On display.
Display Density (DPIs)* | vs. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Features | ![]() |
![]() |
|
Size | 6.7 | 6.7 | 0.0 |
Screen Type | AMOLED | AMOLED | |
Resolution (px) | 1080x2400 | 1440x3216 | 2039040 |
Refresh Rate | 120hz | 120hz | 0 |
Dots per Inch | 392.81 | 525.92 | 133.11 |
Always-On-Display | Yes | Yes | |
Notch | Hole | Hole | |
Peak Brightness | 883 nits | 871 nits | -12 |
HDR | HDR10+ | HDR10+ | |
Sub Tek-Score | 0.9 | ||
Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | |
Tek-Score | -2.6 |
*Reference: 100: Sony Xperia 1 II.
![]() |
![]() |
---|
By DXOMARK's standards, the Galaxy S21 Plus is also roughly 45 points above its rivals with comparable prices. But you can pick either one.
About the Galaxy S21 Plus: DXOMARK gave this shooter a score of 123. And if you take into account its wide-angle lens, it can go up to 137 points. If you want to know more about it, click here.
To put things in perspective: you'd probably like to know that all of its rivals can record videos in 4K or more and have an ultra-wide-angle lens, and 92% feature Optical Image Stabilization. Nevertheless, only 20% of them feature a macro lens.
About the 9 Pro: The guys over at the DXOMARK labs scored this camera with 129 points. And by adding the telephoto and wide-angle lenses, we'll get to the final score of 141 points. Just click here to read about it.
Furthermore, just to let you know, all of its rivals can record videos in 4 or 8K, have an ultra-wide-angle lens, and feature Optical Image Stabilization. Regardless, only 12% of them feature a macro lens.
Considering this score, we can classify these two as high-end.
Picture Quality* | vs. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Primary Camera | ![]() |
![]() |
|
Megapixels | 12 | 48 | 36 |
Aperture | 1.8 | 1.8 | 0.0 |
Lens | 26mm | 23mm | -3 |
Lens Type | Wide-Angle | Wide-Angle | |
Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 |
HDR | Yes | Yes | |
OIS | Yes | Yes | |
Video | 4320 | 4320 | 0 |
Score | 137 | 141 | 4 |
*Reference: 100: Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra.
Extra Camera(s) | ![]() |
![]() |
vs. |
---|---|---|---|
Megapixels | 64 | 8 | -56 |
Aperture | 2.0 | 2.4 | 0.4 |
Lens | 29mm | 77mm (3x zoom) | 48 |
Lens Type | Regular | Telephoto lens | |
Megapixels | 12 | 50 | 38 |
Aperture | 2.2 | 2.2 | 0.0 |
Lens | 13mm | 14mm | 1 |
Lens Type | Ultra-wide-Angle | Ultra-wide-Angle | |
Megapixels | - | 2 | |
Aperture | - | 2.4 | |
Score | 14 | 12 | -2 |
Selfie Camera | ![]() |
![]() |
vs. |
---|---|---|---|
Megapixels | 10 | 16 | 6 |
Aperture | 2.2 | 2.4 | 0.2 |
Lens | 26mm | - |
![]() |
![]() |
vs. | |
---|---|---|---|
Tek-Score | 0.2 |
They're not that far apart, so there is no wrong choice here.
Adding to that, both weigh about the same: 197 g. (6.95 oz). But because screen size also matters, I've come up with an adapted "display size to phone weight ratio" score. The Galaxy S21 Plus got 4.6, showing it has an acceptable score for its screen size. The 9 Pro, on the other hand, has 4.9, so nothing to state here.
The Galaxy S21 Plus is water-resistant in up to 1 to 3 meters, much like the 9 Pro. But remember: it's for a maximum period of half an hour, in standby mode, so no underwater photos.
Looks* | vs. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Body | ![]() |
![]() |
|
Size | 161 x 75 x 7 mm (5.68 x 2.65 x 0.25 in) |
163 x 73 x 8 mm (5.75 x 2.58 x 0.28 in) |
10667 |
Weight | 200 g. (7.05 oz) | 197 g. (6.95 oz) | -3 |
Build | Front and back glass | Front and back glass | |
Colors | Phantom Black, Phantom Violet, Phantom Silver, Phantom Red, Phantom Gold, and Phantom Pink | Morning Mist, Stellar Black, and Forest Green | |
Screen To Body Ratio | 89.75% | 90.78% | 1.03 |
Disp.Size To Weight Score | 4.6 | 4.9 | 0.3 |
Looks | 10.0/10 | 9.1/10 | -0.8 |
Waterproof | IP68 | IP68 | |
Biometrics | Under Display Fingerprint | Under Display Fingerprint | |
Tek-Score | -0.1 |
*100% = 4+ colors + front and back glass + S2BR: 86+%.
The Galaxy S21 Plus has a 4800 mAh battery, and the 9 Pro has a 4500 mAh. And according to GSMArena's tests, the winner is the Galaxy S21 Plus.
Just be aware that the Galaxy S21 Plus is also beating most smartphones. Do check our best-of listing.
Fast charging is indeed fast with the 9 Pro. Devices with similar prices usually sit at nearly 33w.
Quick wireless charging must be one of 9 Pro's most-loved features. You won't find many phones as fast at about its price.
Battery* | vs. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Features | ![]() |
![]() |
|
Capacity (mAh) | 4800 | 4500 | -300 |
1h Talk + 1h Web + 1h Video | 84% left | 82% left | -2 |
1h Talk + 3h Web + 1h Video | 70% left | 67% left | -3 |
1h Talk + 1h Web + 3h Video | 74% left | 67% left | -7 |
Bat. To Phone Size Score | 3.6 | 3.3 | -0.2 |
Sub Tek-Score | -0.4 | ||
Fast Charging | 25w | 65w | 40 |
Wireless Charging | 15w | 50w | 35 |
Reverse Charging | 4.5w | 5w | 0.5 |
Tek-Score | 1.0 |
*Reference: 90: Samsung Galaxy A42.
They share the same amount of storage.
Storage* | vs. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Features | ![]() |
![]() |
|
RAM (GB) | 8GB | 8GB | 0 |
Internal (GB) | 128GB | 128GB | 0 |
Micro SD | No | No | |
Tek-Score | 0.0 |
*Internal Storage + 256GB Memory Card (Max: 512GB).
I'd go for the 9 Pro if you really value Bluetooth 5.2.
They both run on (LTE and) 5G networks.
Connectivity | vs. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Features | ![]() |
![]() |
|
Network | 5G | 5G | |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 | |
NFC | Yes | Yes | |
3.5mm jack | No | No | |
Tek-Score | 0.5 |
Here are their recently updated prices:
Reference: $999
Samsung Galaxy S21 Plus
Reference: $1,070
OnePlus 9 Pro
I earn a small fee from qualifying purchases. It doesn't affect the price you pay nor my opinions, but it will mean a lot if you click on one of these buttons before purchasing your next phone (or whatever else you end up buying). You'll be helping to take this to the next level.
Prices on eBay are in $US but Europe-based. You can click to check the prices in your country.
Prices marked with ! are from renewed/refurbished/carrier-locked phones (except eBay prices that, as a last resort, can be from bids or used devices).
How much of a "phone" can your money buy?
That's how much "score" you can get with $100 based on the global score that you'll see in the next section (higher is better).
Have you found better prices elsewhere? The formula is simple: score/price*100.
Value for money | Galaxy S21 Plus | 9 Pro | VS |
---|---|---|---|
Amazon | - | - | - |
eBay | 1.15 | 0.98 | -0.17 |
Best Buy | - | 0.98 | - |
Walmart | - | - | - |
Also, don't forget to check the latest deals from these four stores, and the state of the art on mobile technology, if you don't want to overpay on your next smartphone.
Related articles:
The Best Unbiased Smartphones For All Budgets
Smartphone Specs Statistics: The State Of The Art (Q1 2021)
So, what about that global score? We'll get there. But first, let's see where its rivals are. The Galaxy S21 Plus class is at 6.9, and the 9 Pro 7.1.
What can the Samsung Galaxy S21 Plus give you that the OnePlus 9 Pro can't:
- Better glass protection
- Better display
- Better battery life
What can the OnePlus 9 Pro give you that the Samsung Galaxy S21 Plus can't:
- More DPIs
- A telephoto lens (+48 mm)
- Faster charging speeds (65w vs. 25w)
- Faster wireless charging (50w vs. 15w)
- Bluetooth 5.2
Pros | ![]() |
![]() |
---|---|---|
#1 | Performance | Performance |
#2 | AMOLED | AMOLED |
#3 | Always-On-Display | Always-On-Display |
#4 | Cameras | Cameras |
#5 | Battery Life | Fast Charging |
#6 | Fast Charging | Wireless Charging |
#7 | Wireless Charging | |
#8 | Glass Protection |
Cons | ![]() |
![]() |
---|---|---|
#1 | MicroSD Slot | MicroSD Slot |
#2 | Weight | Weight |
#3 | 3.5mm Jack | 3.5mm Jack |
#4 | Price | Price |
Relative Score* | vs. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Global Score | ![]() |
![]() |
|
Gaming Score | 0.5 | ||
Tek-Score | -0.10 | ||
Your Score |
*Reference: 100: Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra.
Scroll the sliders down below to get your own personalized score. Let's suppose you value performance and battery life, and you don't really care about anything else. Then, just set the "Performance" and the "Battery" sliders up to 5 (5+5=10), and then the other sliders down to 0. You'll know what's the best phone for you.
Performance | 1.9 | |
Display | 1.7 | |
Cameras | 1.4 | |
Frame | 0.9 | |
Battery | 1.9 | |
Storage | 2.0 | |
Connectivity | 0.4 | |
Total | Should be 10 or as close as possible: | 9.6 |
For suggestions and bug reports, click here. Your help is appreciated. Thank you.
About me
Hello!
My name is Luis Silva, and I have a degree in computer management. Ever since I was a teenager, I've loved everything to do with tech. Music, pictures, video editing, I've done it all! This site is a place for me to share some of the knowledge I have, as well as keep up-to-date with current trends. This is a wonderful place for tech-geeks and everyone else that just want to learn more about tech and smartphones in general.
Keep in touch