Home : Smartphones

Samsung Galaxy A50 vs A51: Is It Worth The Upgrade?

author Luis Silva (March 2021 Updated: August 2021 - 6 min. reading time)

The price of the Galaxy A51 isn't that much higher, but it's the smartphone you should pick.

Yet, there's no significant difference between them.

Keep in mind that these are both great devices since their final score is almost the same.

How much more are you willing to spend on the Galaxy A51?

If you ignore carrier offers, you're going to shell out an extra amount of about $15.

Is it worth getting the Galaxy A50 in 2021?

Overall, you'll still get a pretty decent smartphone if you go for the Galaxy A50 in 2021, as it still retains its value. Nevertheless, you should also check other phones like the Galaxy A42 because it has better performance, better battery life, more storage, more security updates, and 4K video recording.

Is it still worth buying the Galaxy A51 in 2021?

The Galaxy A51 isn't the latest release anymore, but you'll still be happy with its below-average weight. It holds up pretty well in 2021, but note that the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite features better performance, more storage, faster charging, more RAM, and a glass body.

Keep reading to learn more about what sets them apart, how they fare against their competition, and how other specialists evaluate them.

Check prices on Amazon Check prices on Amazon
Click here or scroll down to check prices on eBay, BestBuy, and Walmart.

I earn a small fee from qualifying purchases. It doesn't affect the price you pay nor my opinions.

Samsung Galaxy A50, Samsung Galaxy A51

CONTENTS

Click on one of these
shortcuts and then tap
"back" to return here

Introduction

Samsung launched its Galaxy A51 in December 2019, while Samsung's Galaxy A50 arrived at stores in March 2019.

We've run down the specs, design, price, and much more in this guide to help you choose between the Galaxy A50 and the Galaxy A51.

The weight of each section

For additional information regarding our smartphone comparisons, check this FAQ.

to check who their rivals are.

Price*
vs.
Device Galaxy A50 Galaxy A51
Release Date 2019, March 2019, December 0y.
OS Updates 3 years 3 years 0y.
Security Updates 4 years 4 years 0y.

*Reference: 100: Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra.

Which One Has The Best Performance?

Performance isn't a contest between these two, says Geekbench 5. Basically, you wouldn't be able to tell the difference.

Be aware that these two aren't winning any race, as they're terribly slow if you consider related-priced phones.

It's safe to say that both of them can be tagged as low to mid-range.

Performance*
vs.
Features Galaxy A50 Galaxy A51
SoC Exynos 9610 Exynos 9611
Graphics Mali-G72 MP3 Mali-G72 MP3
Geekbench 5 Score 1186
1186
0
OS Android 9 (Pie) and OneUI Android 10 and OneUI
Tek-Score
4.0
4.0
0.0

*Reference: 100: Apple iPhone 12.

Which Phone Has The Best Display?

Samsung Galaxy A50 front transparent png Samsung Galaxy A51 front transparent png

There's no phone to praise here, so none of these stands out.

Usually, anything below 500 nits will disappoint you when in direct sunlight or displaying HDR content.

Now about the Galaxy A50: only 19% of its competitors have refresh rates over 60hz, and only 8% of them feature Gorilla Glass 6 or Victus.

Concerning the Galaxy A51, 77% of its rivals have an AMOLED screen. Although, only 12% of them feature Gorilla Glass 6 or Victus.

Display Density (DPIs)*
vs.
Features Galaxy A50 Galaxy A51
Size 6.4
6.5
0.1
Screen Type AMOLED AMOLED
Resolution (px) 1080x2340
1080x2400
64800
Refresh Rate 60hz 60hz 0
Dots per Inch 402.69
404.89
2.20
Always-On-Display Yes Yes
Notch Teardrop Hole
Peak Brightness 550 nits
636 nits
86
HDR - -
Sub Tek-Score
7.8
8.1
0.3
Protection Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Tek-Score
3.9
4.1
0.1

*Reference: 100: Sony Xperia 1 II.

Which Phone Has The Best Cameras?

Samsung Galaxy A50 back transparent png Samsung Galaxy A51 back transparent png

By DXOMARK's standards, the Galaxy A50 is also roughly 47% above other smartphones at about this price tag. But it isn't the one I'm recommending.

About the Galaxy A50: DXOMARK has rated this camera with a score of 81. And if you take into account its wide-angle lens, it can go up to 86 points. If you click here, you can check what they think of it.

I hope this helps: you'd probably like to know that 81% of its rivals can record videos in 4K or more, and all have an ultra-wide-angle lens. Yet, only 15% of them come with a telephoto lens and come with Optical Image Stabilization.

About the Galaxy A51: DXOMARK evaluated this camera, and here's the score: 90. Plus, combining with its wide-angle lens, this score goes up to 96 points. If you want to know more about every tidbit, check it here.

Furthermore, just to let you know, just like the other device, 81% of its rivals can record videos in 4 or 8K, and all have an ultra-wide-angle lens. Regardless, only 19% of them come with a telephoto lens, and only 23% of them come with Optical Image Stabilization.

If you're not a numbers person, we can tag the Galaxy A50 as a low to mid-range and the Galaxy A51 more as mid-range.

If you take optical zoom seriously, it might be time to consider smartphones like the Galaxy S20 FE.

Picture Quality*
vs.
Primary Camera Galaxy A50 Galaxy A51
Megapixels 25
48
23
Aperture 1.7
2.0
0.3
Lens 26mm
26mm
0
Lens Type Wide-Angle Wide-Angle
Flash 1 1 0
HDR Yes Yes
OIS No No
Video 1080 2160 1080
Score 86
96
10

*Reference: 100: Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra.

Extra Camera(s) Galaxy A50 Galaxy A51 vs.
Megapixels 8
12
4
Aperture 2.2
2.2
0.0
Lens 13mm 13mm 0
Lens Type Ultra-wide-Angle Ultra-wide-Angle
Megapixels 5 5 0
Aperture 2.2 2.4 0.2
Lens - 40mm
Lens Type Depth Sensor Macro
Megapixels - 5
Aperture - 2.2
Lens Type - Depth Sensor
Score 5 6 1
Selfie Camera Galaxy A50 Galaxy A51 vs.
Megapixels 25
32
7
Aperture 2.0
2.2
0.2
Lens 25mm 26mm 1
Galaxy A50 Galaxy A51 vs.
Tek-Score
5.1
5.6
0.6

Who has the best frame?

It's a tie, so don't worry too much.

The Galaxy A51 is 6 g. (0.24 oz) heavier than the other, weighing about 166 g. (5.86 oz). If you're looking for a lightweight device, the Galaxy A50 has a "weight to screen size" score of 7.7, which means it's one of the lightest phones for a 6.4 inches screen. The Galaxy A51, on the other hand, has 7.2, which is pretty nice.

Want your next phone to also be water-resistant? Then check out the Galaxy S20 FE.

Looks*
vs.
Body Galaxy A50 Galaxy A51
Size 158 x 74 x 7 mm
(5.57 x 2.61 x 0.25 in)
158 x 73 x 7 mm
(5.57 x 2.58 x 0.25 in)
-1106
Weight 166 g. (5.86 oz)
172 g. (6.07 oz)
6
Build Front glass Front glass
Colors Black, Blue, White, and Coral Prism Crush Black, Blue, White, and Pink
Screen To Body Ratio 86.00%
88.44%
2.44
Disp.Size To Weight Score 7.7 7.2 -0.5
Looks 6.4/10 6.6/10
0.2
Waterproof - -
Biometrics Under Display Fingerprint Under Display Fingerprint
Tek-Score
2.8
2.6
-0.2

*100% = 4+ colors + front and back glass + S2BR: 86+%.

Which has the best battery?

Both have about 4000 mAh. And GSMArena did test them out, and there's no real difference between them.

How much are you willing to pay for reverse wireless charging? Because that's already a reality on the Galaxy S20 FE, for example.

Battery*
vs.
Features Galaxy A50 Galaxy A51
Capacity (mAh) 4000 4000 0
1h Talk + 1h Web + 1h Video 82% left
81% left
-1
1h Talk + 3h Web + 1h Video 66% left
66% left
0
1h Talk + 1h Web + 3h Video 70% left
67% left
-3
Bat. To Phone Size Score 4.3 4.4 0.0
Sub Tek-Score
7.3
7.1
-0.1
Fast Charging 15w
15w
0
Wireless Charging No No 0
Tek-Score
6.2
6.1
-0.1

*Reference: 90: Samsung Galaxy A31.

Which has more storage?

It's a tie.

Storage shouldn't be an issue on any of these phones. However, if you love to have or record tons of videos, 64 GB alone won't get you there.

Storage*
vs.
Features Galaxy A50 Galaxy A51
RAM (GB) 4GB
4GB
0
Internal (GB) 64GB
64GB
0
Micro SD microSDXC (dedicated slot) microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Tek-Score
6.3
6.3
0.0

*Internal Storage + 256GB Memory Card (Max: 512GB).

Which is the most connectivity-friendly?

There also isn't much to see here.

The Galaxy A51 has two network variants: LTE or (LTE and) 5G. If you'd rather have 128GB of internal storage, an Exynos 980, 6GB of RAM, a 4500 mAh battery, and a GeekBench 5 score of 1867, you should consider the 5G version of the Galaxy A51.

Connectivity
vs.
Features Galaxy A50 Galaxy A51
Network LTE LTE (also available in 5G)
Bluetooth 5.0
5.0
NFC Yes (market dependent) Yes
3.5mm jack Yes Yes
Tek-Score
8.5
8.5
0.0

Which is more affordable?

Here are their recently updated prices:

Samsung Galaxy A50

Reference: $265

Samsung Galaxy A50

Samsung Galaxy A51

Reference: $280

Samsung Galaxy A51

I earn a small fee from qualifying purchases. It doesn't affect the price you pay nor my opinions, but it will mean a lot if you click on one of these buttons before purchasing your next phone (or whatever else you end up buying). You'll be helping to take this to the next level.

Prices on eBay are in $US but Europe-based. You can click to check the prices in your country.

Prices marked with ! are from renewed/refurbished/carrier-locked phones (except eBay prices that, as a last resort, can be from bids or used devices).

How much of a "phone" can your money buy?
That's how much "score" you can get with $100 based on the global score that you'll see in the next section (higher is better).

Have you found better prices elsewhere? The formula is simple: score/price*100.

Value for money Galaxy A50 Galaxy A51 VS
Amazon 1.95 1.55 -0.40
eBay - - -
Best Buy - - -
Walmart - - -

Also, don't forget to check the latest deals from these four stores, and the state of the art on mobile technology, if you don't want to overpay on your next smartphone.


Related articles:


Best smartphone deals


The Best Unbiased Smartphones For All Budgets


Smartphone Specs Statistics: The State Of The Art (Q1 2021)

Are you ready for that final score? We're almost there. Just so you have an idea, take a look at where its adversaries average. They're at 5.6 (for the Galaxy A50) and 5.7 (for the Galaxy A51).

Verdict: Does any of them really stand out?

If you already own a Galaxy A51, I don't see a meaningful reason for an upgrade. I don't really get why Samsung released yet another mid-range device. The camera did improve a bit, but since everything else remains the same, if you're in the market for an affordable phone, you may as well end up saving a few bucks with the A50, or perhaps the A31.

The 5G variant of the Galaxy A51 is a whole new story, and yes, I do recommend it over these two, but that's not the point of this article.

Pros Galaxy A50 Galaxy A51
#1 AMOLED AMOLED
#2 Always-On-Display Always-On-Display
#3 Fast Charging Fast Charging
#4 MicroSD Slot MicroSD Slot
#5 3.5mm Jack 3.5mm Jack
Cons Galaxy A50 Galaxy A51
#1 Wireless Charging Wireless Charging
#2 Glass Protection Glass Protection
Relative Score*
vs.
Global Score Galaxy A50 Galaxy A51
Gaming Score
4.3
4.5
0.2
Tek-Score
5.17
5.23
0.06
Your Score

Scroll the sliders down below to get your own personalized score. Let's suppose you value performance and battery life, and you don't really care about anything else. Then, just set the "Performance" and the "Battery" sliders up to 5 (5+5=10), and then the other sliders down to 0. You'll know what's the best phone for you.

Performance 1.9
Display 1.7
Cameras 1.4
Frame 0.9
Battery 1.9
Storage 2.0
Connectivity 0.4
Total Should be 10 or as close as possible: 9.6

*Reference: 100: Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra.

For suggestions and bug reports, click here. Your help is appreciated. Thank you.

If you want to know more about them, click here:

About me

Hello!

My name is Luis Silva, and I have a degree in computer management. Ever since I was a teenager, I've loved everything to do with tech. Music, pictures, video editing, I've done it all! This site is a place for me to share some of the knowledge I have, as well as keep up-to-date with current trends. This is a wonderful place for tech-geeks and everyone else that just want to learn more about tech and smartphones in general.


Keep in touch


pinterest logo Follow us on Pinterest

facebook logo Join our Facebook group







No spam, I promise. You can unsubscribe at any time and I'll never share your email without your permission.



Samsung Galaxy A50 Related Comparisons


Samsung Galaxy A51 Related Comparisons

×

"Display size to phone weight" ratio explained

This indeed is a "display size to phone weight" ratio, but because every phone ended up somewhere between 0.0272 and 0.0421, I've amplified (adapted) those values so they would fit in a 0-10 scale. As of now, the best smartphone is the Samsung Galaxy A40, with 140g. (4.94 oz) for a 5.9 inch display. It got a score of 9.92. While the worse device is the iPhone 8 Plus, which weighs 202 g. (7.13 oz) and has a 5.5-inch display. It ended up with a score of 0.75.

Please, be aware that this score is subject to change if and when a new smartphone comes along that ends up being outside of this scale.

×

"Battery to device size" ratio explained

This score should give you an idea about the energy footprint of the devices you're considering. It reflects not only the hardware and the energy that it requires but also the amount of energy that the battery can deliver.

The major spenders on any device should be the display and the SoC. But everything from a notification led to its modems need to be optimized, or else, the OEM should simply include a bigger battery as a compensation. Unfortunately, it isn't always possible due to size limitations. But in the end, if a particular OEM can do a good job and give you excellent battery life on a small device, so should everyone else. That's why I've added a "battery to device size" ratio. But since the real scale went from 119 (for the Galaxy S10e, Snapdragon variant) and up to 164 (for the iPhone 7 Plus), I've decided to convert them so they would fit in a 0-10 scale, being 0 the worst device, (the iPhone 7 Plus) and 10 the one every OEM should look up to.

As an example, Apple did an excellent job on the iPhone 7. It has a score of 8. Despite having a small capacity, the hardware is well optimized, and it still gives you decent battery life considering its size. The iPhone 7 Plus, on the other hand, with those bezels shrinking its display size, clearly could've been the #1 in our top 10 list of best battery devices if Apple simply filled all that empty space with a bigger battery.

As a side note: I haven't included the dept of the devices in this formula because even if a device ended up being 1mm/0.03 inches thicker, it wouldn't matter that much to those who really value battery life.

Please, be aware that this score is subject to change if and when a new smartphone comes along that ends up being outside of this scale.

×

Rivals

As of now, these are the rivals that were considered for each of them. They may change every time its prices are updated.

These are the lowest prices found on Amazon, eBay, BestBuy, and Walmart.


 Samsung Galaxy A50 
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A70
    $255
  • HuaweirivalP30 Lite
    $280
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A40
    $240
  • XiaomirivalMi 9T
    $270
  • XiaomirivalRedmi Note 8 Pro
    $215
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy M30s
    $300
  • XiaomirivalPocophone F1
    $250
  • ApplerivaliPhone 7 Plus
    $260
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S9
    $305
  • RealmerivalXT
    $290
  • ApplerivaliPhone 7
    $250
  • OnePlusrival6T
    $300
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S9 Plus
    $305
  • HuaweirivalMate 20
    $285
  • XiaomirivalMi 9 Lite
    $317
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S10 Lite
    $299
  • XiaomirivalMi 9 SE
    $250
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A51
    $280
  • HuaweirivalP40 Lite
    $223
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A31
    $225
  • OnePlusrivalNord N10
    $299
  • XiaomirivalPoco X3 NFC
    $230
  • XiaomirivalRedmi Note 10 Pro
    $255
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A32
    $252
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A42
    $299
  • XiaomirivalPoco X3 Pro
    $243
  • XiaomirivalRedmi Note 10
    $218
  • XiaomirivalRedmi Note 10 Pro Max
    $292
  • XiaomirivalMi 9t
    $270

 Samsung Galaxy A51 
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A50
    $265
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A70
    $255
  • HuaweirivalP30 Lite
    $280
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A40
    $240
  • XiaomirivalMi 9T
    $270
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy M30s
    $300
  • XiaomirivalPocophone F1
    $250
  • ApplerivaliPhone 7 Plus
    $260
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S9
    $305
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S20+ EX
    $329
  • OnePlusrival7T
    $329
  • RealmerivalXT
    $290
  • ApplerivaliPhone 7
    $250
  • OnePlusrival6T
    $300
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S9 Plus
    $305
  • HuaweirivalMate 20
    $285
  • XiaomirivalMi 9 Lite
    $317
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S10 Lite
    $299
  • XiaomirivalMi 9 SE
    $250
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A31
    $225
  • OnePlusrivalNord N10
    $299
  • XiaomirivalMi 10T Lite
    $325
  • XiaomirivalPoco X3 NFC
    $230
  • XiaomirivalRedmi Note 10 Pro
    $255
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A32
    $252
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A42
    $299
  • XiaomirivalPoco X3 Pro
    $243
  • XiaomirivalRedmi Note 10 Pro Max
    $292
  • XiaomirivalMi 9t
    $270
×

Formula deviation

Since the guys at DxoMark don't review every camera out there, I've come up with a formula based on the ones that they do rate, so I could get an equivalent score for the ones they don't review. After testing it against these cameras, I got the deviation between that and their DxO score.

Device: DxOScore Deviation
Samsung Galaxy A50: 88 -1
Apple iPhone XR: 104 1
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro: 108 -7
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro: 87 1
Sony Xperia 1: 99 -1
Sony Xperia 5: 101 1
Samsung Galaxy Note 8: 100 0
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus: 126 2
Apple iPhone 8 Plus: 96 -3
Xiaomi Pocophone F1: 92 -1
Apple iPhone 7 Plus: 90 -1
Apple iPhone X: 101 3
Apple iPhone 11: 112 -1
Samsung Galaxy Note 8: 100 0
Samsung Galaxy Note 9: 107 1
Apple iPhone XS Max: 110 -2
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max: 124 1
Samsung Galaxy S10: 124 2
Apple iPhone XS: 110 -1
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus: 120 -2
OnePlus 7 Pro: 122 0
OnePlus 7T Pro: 122 0
Huawei P30 Pro: 125 -1
Google Pixel 4: 117 0
Google Pixel 3: 103 0
Google Pixel 2: 100 0
Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus: 127 -2
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra: 132 2
OnePlus 6: 100 0
OnePlus 6T: 101 1
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus: 105 -1
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: 120 0
Xiaomi Mi 9: 115 0
Huawei Mate 30 Pro: 132 0
Huawei P40 Pro: 140 -1
Apple iPhone SE 2: 101 0
OnePlus 8 Pro: 126 0
Xiaomi Mi 8: 105 1
Samsung Galaxy A71: 89 1
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro: 134 0

As you can see, most cameras sit between 1 and -1, while a few of them go up to 2 or -2. That means it's reasonable to assume other similar cameras that they don't review to, in the worst-case scenario, be anywhere from -2 to 2 points from the score that the formula gets.

For example: Given that the Pixel 4 got 117 points and that the Pixel 4 XL share the same year and camera specs, it's reasonable to expect a score of 117 too. But in reality, if they do review that camera, it may end up anywhere between 115 and 119.

Be aware that at DxO, they give a score based on their opinion, not based on any formula. That's why I think there's an odd difference of 6 points between the iPhone 8 Plus and the iPhone X. In theory, they should have the same camera.

I'm guessing that the Mi 9T Pro got a deviation of 7 points because they tested its Chinese variant (the K20 Pro).

Update: They just changed their protocol to include preview image evaluation and trustability. I'm keeping the old table (for now) for reference purposes, and I'll be adding a new one as soon as they review at least a couple of new mclass-range cameras.

You can expect the same (or a bit bigger) deviation for high-end cameras, but anything with a score below 100-110 should be taken with a grain of salt.

This is valid for all cameras tested with the previous protocol. For those that they dclassn't test, the deviation may be up to twice as much.

×

About GeekBench 5

This is just a quick note to let you know that, if, by any chance, the smartphone you're looking for isn't on the GeekBench site yet, you can check on GsmArena.com, as they also usually test smartphones with that benchmark tool.



Top 10 Smartphones