Home : Smartphones

Apple iPhone 6s vs SE 2 in 2021: Is The SE 2 Good Enough?

author Luis Silva (August 2020 Updated: July 2021 - 8 min. reading time)

The iPhone SE 2 comes at a higher price, but it's the smartphone you should pick.

It has better performance (+497%), water-resistance, a glass back, more OS updates (5 additional years), and more internal storage (64GB vs. 32GB).

Anything else?

The iPhone SE 2 also gives you optical image stabilization, wireless charging, more RAM (3GB vs. 2GB), and Bluetooth 5. But the iPhone 6s will give you a headphone jack.

How much will the additional specs cost me?

If you're not considering subscribing to a service provider, you'll have to invest an additional amount close to $251.

Is it worth buying the iPhone 6s in 2021?

You shouldn't pick the iPhone 6s in 2021 unless you can find an outstanding deal. It's losing its security updates, and the is an overall better phone, as it's a much better choice since you'll get better performance, better cameras, more storage, more security updates, faster charging, more RAM, a glass body, and water resistance.

Is the iPhone SE 2 still worth getting in 2021?

For a phone introduced in 2020, the iPhone SE 2 still has good performance and good cameras. That's why I'll continue to recommend it in 2021, but a fantastic device like the iPhone 12 Mini does have better performance, better cameras, more RAM, and better display.

Keep reading for answers to all your questions about their differences, how they fare against their competition, and how other specialists evaluate them.

Check prices on Amazon Check prices on Amazon
Click here or scroll down to check prices on eBay, BestBuy, and Walmart.

I earn a small fee from qualifying purchases. It doesn't affect the price you pay nor my opinions.

Apple iPhone 6s, Apple iPhone SE 2

Photo by FreePhotosART from Pixabay


Click on one of these
shortcuts and then tap
"back" to return here


If you're here, most likely you're considering picking one of these. I do hope you're considering the newer iPhone SE 2, even if it's refurbished or something like that. But I also know there are people still looking for the iPhone 6S. Either way, I welcome you all.

In April of 2020, Apple launched its iPhone SE 2. The iPhone 6s, however, saw the light of day in September 2015.

Here you can look at the iPhone 6s and the iPhone SE 2, compare each other's features, and decide which one is best for you. Let us delve into the finer details.

You'll rarely (if ever) find these two with the same price tag. That's something you should keep in mind when comparing them.

It's probably a good idea to stay away from the iPhone 6s because it most likely, won't receive security updates much longer.

While scrolling down, you'll see a "Tek-Score" for each phone in every section. For a quicker analysis of how far they are from each other, we'll consider all their specifications. You'll find a global score at the end, which can help you compare to other phones if you aren't sure about these two.

The weight of each section

That score is research-based. It's from Globalwebindex.com about the most desired smartphone features by consumers. But you can fine-tune the global score depending on whatever you like. You can go there right now, or just keep reading.

For additional information regarding our smartphone comparisons, check this FAQ.

Some features have a colored bar next to them. That's to show how they rival their direct competitors.

You can click here: to view the ones we're comparing to, but basically, we've excluded every smartphone that's not within a 20% (above or below) price range.

You can click on any underlined feature to check several top 10 tables for every spending plan.

Device iPhone 6s iPhone SE 2
Release Date 2015, September 2020, April 5y.
OS Updates 6 years 6 years 0y.
Security Updates 6 years 6 years 0y.

*Reference: 100: Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra.

Which One Has The Best Performance?

On the multicore portion of Geekbench 5, which measures overall performance, the iPhone SE 2 was, on average, 497% quicker while finishing its tests. This should be a no-brainer here.

The iPhone SE 2 is also a top performer if you consider related-priced phones. About 45% above.

By the way, you can define the iPhone SE 2 as high-end.

Inside the iPhone SE 2 is an Apple A13 SoC, while on the iPhone 6s, there's an Apple A9 chipset.

Regarding the graphics chipset, the former features a proprietary Apple GPU, and the latter has a PowerVR GT7600.

The iPhone 6s carries out iOS 9 OS, and the iPhone SE 2 got the iOS 13.

Features iPhone 6s iPhone SE 2
SoC Apple A9 Apple A13
Graphics PowerVR GT7600 Apple GPU
Geekbench 5 Score 542
OS iOS 9 iOS 13

*Reference: 100: Apple iPhone 12.

Which Phone Has The Best Display?

Apple iPhone 6s front transparent png Apple iPhone SE 2 front transparent png

They ended up with identical scores, so you have to decide for yourself.

Both feature the same LCD 4.7" display size. You'll likely have set your preferences already on the display type and size.

These phones also share the same amount of pixels: 750x1334 HD.

No one likes to look at a shattered screen, so let's get the elephant out of the room. Both feature an Ion-strengthened glass display.

Unfortunately, none of them support the Always-On display feature.

If you're looking for the brightest display, the iPhone 6s will deliver 625 nits, while the iPhone SE 2 only does 530 nits.

Most phones from this price range max at 713 nits, but the iPhone SE 2 can only go 183 nits below that.

Usually, anything below 500 nits can't do true HDR, nor is that great on a sunny day.

Putting the iPhone 6s in perspective: only 7% of its competitors have refresh rates over 60hz, and none of them feature Gorilla Glass 6 or Victus.

Concerning the iPhone SE 2, please be aware that 83% of its rivals can play HDR content, 97% have an AMOLED screen, and 80% have an Always-On display.

Display Density (DPIs)*
Features iPhone 6s iPhone SE 2
Size 4.7
Screen Type LCD LCD
Resolution (px) 750x1334
Refresh Rate 60hz 60hz 0
Dots per Inch 325.61
Always-On-Display No No
Notch - -
Peak Brightness 625 nits
530 nits
HDR - -
Sub Tek-Score
Protection Ion-strengthened glass Ion-strengthened glass

*Reference: 100: Sony Xperia 1 II.

Which Phone Has The Best Cameras?

Apple iPhone 6s back transparent png Apple iPhone SE 2 back transparent png

Overall, I'm sure the Apple iPhone SE 2 has a better camera.

Let's flip the phones over and start the cameras' battle. The iPhone 6s has a 12 Megapixels camera with an aperture of f/2.2, a 29mm wide-angle lens, two flash LEDs, and HDR capabilities. It can record videos at up to 2160p.

There's also a 5 Mp selfie camera with an aperture of f/2.2 and a 31 mm lens.

Unfortunately, DXOMARK hasn't tested this camera, but we don't need a crystal ball to guess the score: 95*. If you add its digital zoom abilities, that will go up to 99**.

Before moving on, you should know that 86% of its rivals can record videos in 4K or more, and all have an ultra-wide-angle lens. Although none of them come with a telephoto lens.

With its 12 Megapixels shooter, the iPhone SE 2's leading camera has an aperture of f/1.8 and a 28mm, wide-angle lens. You'll be getting four flash LEDs, HDR capabilities, and Optical Image Stabilization too. You can record videos at 2160p.

On the front, there's an f/2.2 7 Mp camera and a standard lens.

The guys over at the DXOMARK labs scored this camera with 108 points. By adding its digital zoom abilities, we get a score of 112 points. You can click here to check it out.

Lastly, all of its rivals can record videos in 4 or 8K and have an ultra-wide-angle lens. Regardless, only 23% of them feature a macro lens.

One can place the iPhone SE 2 as an upper mid-range.

*DXOMARK is a world-known reference in the camera benchmarking department. I'd love to see more tests, but some phones are just left out. That's why when I come across one of them, I take every hardware specs (like lenses, sensor size, OIS, aperture, and so on) and give a comparable score. The last time I've checked this formula, some cameras had a borderline margin of error of 2 points.

**You should give this score a margin of error of up to 6 points, particularly on mid-end cameras with less than 40MP and no zoom lens. They moved to a better camera test protocol, and I need more reviewed devices to fine-tune older scores.

Picture Quality*
Primary Camera iPhone 6s iPhone SE 2
Megapixels 12
Aperture 2.2
Lens 29mm
Lens Type Regular Regular
Flash 2 4 2
HDR Yes Yes
OIS No Yes
Video 2160 2160 0
Score 99

*Reference: 100: Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra.

Extra Camera(s) iPhone 6s iPhone SE 2 vs.
Megapixels - -
Aperture - -
Score 4 4 0
Selfie Camera iPhone 6s iPhone SE 2 vs.
Megapixels 5
Aperture 2.2
Lens 31mm -
iPhone 6s iPhone SE 2 vs.

Who has the best frame?

The iPhone SE 2 does have an advantage here, thanks to its glass back, water resistance, and looks.

Both phones have the same height (138 mm / 5.44 inches), together with the same width (67 mm / 2.64 inches).

If you're looking for the thinnest phone, you're out of luck. Both have 7 mm (0.28 inches). In addition to that, the iPhone SE 2 is 19% smaller than most phones from this price range.

The iPhone SE 2 also has a glass back, and it looks gorgeous. With both iPhones weighing about 143 g. (5.04 oz) there isn't much to consider here. If you're looking for a lightweight device, I've come up with an adapted "display size to phone weight ratio" score. The iPhone 6s got 4.2, meaning it has an acceptable score for its display size. In the meantime, the iPhone SE 2 has 3.5, which suggests it's considerably hefty.

If you like having color options, you can buy the iPhone 6s in Space Gray, Gold, Silver, and Rose Gold. The iPhone SE 2, in its turn, comes in Black, Red, and White.

Do you value a fingerprint scanner? They all have one.

The iPhone SE 2 is rated IP67, which means it's water-resistant in up to 1 meter. But remember: it's for a maximum period of half an hour, in standby and freshwater only, so no saltwater or pools here.

Body iPhone 6s iPhone SE 2
Size 138 x 67 x 7 mm
(4.87 x 2.36 x 0.25 in)
138 x 67 x 7 mm
(4.87 x 2.36 x 0.25 in)
Weight 143 g. (5.04 oz)
148 g. (5.22 oz)
Build Front glass Front and back glass
Colors Space Gray, Gold, Silver, and Rose Gold Black, Red, and White
Screen To Body Ratio 65.85%
Disp.Size To Weight Score 4.2 3.5 -0.7
Looks 1.7/10 4.2/10
Waterproof - IP67
Biometrics Front Fingerprint Front Fingerprint

*100% = 4+ colors + front and back glass + S2BR: 86+%.

Which has the best battery?

At 1715 mAh, the iPhone 6s is the owner of the smallest battery, while the iPhone SE 2 features 1821 mAh. But according to GSMArena's tests, both should theoretically get the same battery life.

This is how the iPhone 6s performs after a full charge:

  • From 1 hour of talking, 1 hour of web browsing, and 1 hour of video playback, you'll end up with 73% of the battery charge.
  • By talking for 1 hour, browsing the web for 3 hours, and playing videos for 1 hour, the battery charge will be about 57%.
  • If you do 1 hour of talking, 1 hour of web browsing, and 3 hours of video playback, the phone will have 55% left for the rest of the day.

And these are iPhone SE 2's patterns:

  • For 1 hour of talking, 1 hour of web browsing, and 1 hour of video playback, you'll be at 72% of the battery charge.
  • From 1 hour of talking, 3 hours of web browsing, and 1 hour of video playback, this phone should end with 57%.
  • From 1 hour of talking, 1 hour of web browsing, and 3 hours of video playback, you'll be with 50%.

This is one of the iPhone SE 2's worse features. Way worse than other similarly priced devices. These results show that it lasts about 19% less.

If you love fast charging, consider going for the iPhone SE 2.

You can also give the iPhone SE 2 extra credits for having wireless charging of up to 5w/hour.

Features iPhone 6s iPhone SE 2
Capacity (mAh) 1715 1821 106
1h Talk + 1h Web + 1h Video 73% left
72% left
1h Talk + 3h Web + 1h Video 57% left
57% left
1h Talk + 1h Web + 3h Video 55% left
50% left
Bat. To Phone Size Score 7.2 6.9 -0.3
Sub Tek-Score
Fast Charging No 18w
Wireless Charging No 5w

*Reference: 90: Samsung Galaxy A31.

Which has more storage?

Definitely, the iPhone SE 2.

The iPhone 6s features 32GB of internal storage and 2GB of RAM. Memory cards aren't welcome here. While it shouldn't be a deal-breaker, you should keep that in mind when purchasing one.

In its turn, the iPhone SE 2 has 3GB of RAM and 64GB of integrated storage. You'll also have a problem if you want to add storage later. This may not be enough for serious smartphone users. You may already know, but you can get more storage and more RAM on most of its rivals. 6Gb of RAM and 115Gb of storage: that's the average, not the best you can find.

Most people should be OK with only 64 GB of internal storage. However, if you love to have or record tons of videos, 32 GB will be a problem sooner than later.

Features iPhone 6s iPhone SE 2
Internal (GB) 32GB
Micro SD No No

*Internal Storage + 256GB Memory Card (Max: 512GB).

Which is the most connectivity-friendly?

The iPhone 6s is your better option, as it features a headphone jack.

Each has its own Bluetooth version: The iPhone 6s has 4.2, and the iPhone SE 2 has 5.0. Bluetooth 5 increased range, speed, and the number of simultaneous connections. Both phones have NFC. Be aware that the NFC on the iPhone 6s is market-dependent.

At least the iPhone 6s still features the 3.5mm headphone jack. Want a piece of advice? Forget about adapters and go for the wireless buds on the iPhone SE 2.

These two are LTE compatible.

Features iPhone 6s iPhone SE 2
Network LTE LTE
Bluetooth 4.2
NFC Yes (Apple Pay only) Yes
3.5mm jack Yes No

Which is more affordable?

The Apple iPhone 6s may not be the cheapest phone, but it's cheaper nonetheless. But that depends on the deals that you can find. The Apple iPhone SE 2, on the other hand, is usually more costly, but if it's worth it or not, it's up to you to decide.

Let's see if it really worths it or not.

You're not looking to purchase the older model, are you?

Here are their recently updated prices:

Apple iPhone 6s

Reference: $199

Apple iPhone 6s

Apple iPhone SE 2

Reference: $450

Apple iPhone SE 2

I earn a small fee from qualifying purchases. It doesn't affect the price you pay nor my opinions, but it will mean a lot if you click on one of these buttons before purchasing your next phone (or whatever else you end up buying). You'll be helping to take this to the next level.

Prices on eBay are in $US but Europe-based. You can click to check the prices in your country.

Prices marked with ! are from renewed/refurbished/carrier-locked phones (except eBay prices that, as a last resort, can be from bids or used devices).

How much of a "phone" can your money buy?
That's how much "score" you can get with $100 based on the global score that you'll see in the next section (higher is better).

Have you found better prices elsewhere? The formula is simple: score/price*100.

Value for money iPhone 6s iPhone SE 2 VS
Amazon - - ! -
eBay 1.11 1.39 0.28
Best Buy - ! - -
Walmart - ! - -

Also, don't forget to check the latest deals from these four stores, and the state of the art on mobile technology, if you don't want to overpay on your next smartphone.

Related articles:

Best smartphone deals

The Best Unbiased Smartphones For All Budgets

Smartphone Specs Statistics: The State Of The Art (Q1 2021)

Are you curious to know what their global score is? For reference purposes, I'll tell you where most of its rivals average. The iPhone 6s class is at 5.5, and the iPhone SE 2 6.3.

Verdict: What Makes the Apple iPhone SE 2 Stand Out?

I'm obviously not recommending the iPhone 6s, because these two are worlds apart.

As odd as it seems, they do have their similarities, like their size, display, weight, battery life, and looks (despite the aluminum vs. glass back). But that's as far as they go.

Performance-wise, it's just night and day. Cameras, storage, and RAM also got an impressive improvement, although none of them stand out in their class.

Despite losing the 3.5mm jack on the SE 2, you'll get two extra bonus: wireless and fast charging.

Pros iPhone 6s iPhone SE 2
#1 3.5mm Jack Performance
#2 Cameras
#3 Fast Charging
#4 Wireless Charging
Cons iPhone 6s iPhone SE 2
#1 Performance Screen Resolution
#2 Screen Resolution AMOLED
#3 AMOLED Always-On-Display
#4 Always-On-Display Battery Life
#5 Battery Life MicroSD Slot
#6 Fast Charging 3.5mm Jack
#7 Wireless Charging Price
#8 MicroSD Slot
Relative Score*
Global Score iPhone 6s iPhone SE 2
Gaming Score
Your Score

Scroll the sliders down below to get your own personalized score. Let's suppose you value performance and battery life, and you don't really care about anything else. Then, just set the "Performance" and the "Battery" sliders up to 5 (5+5=10), and then the other sliders down to 0. You'll know what's the best phone for you.

Performance 1.9
Display 1.7
Cameras 1.4
Frame 0.9
Battery 1.9
Storage 2.0
Connectivity 0.4
Total Should be 10 or as close as possible: 9.6

*Reference: 100: Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra.

For suggestions and bug reports, click here. Your help is appreciated. Thank you.

If you want to know more about them, click here:

About me


My name is Luis Silva, and I have a degree in computer management. Ever since I was a teenager, I've loved everything to do with tech. Music, pictures, video editing, I've done it all! This site is a place for me to share some of the knowledge I have, as well as keep up-to-date with current trends. This is a wonderful place for tech-geeks and everyone else that just want to learn more about tech and smartphones in general.

Keep in touch

pinterest logo Follow us on Pinterest

facebook logo Join our Facebook group

No spam, I promise. You can unsubscribe at any time and I'll never share your email without your permission.

Apple iPhone 6s Related Comparisons

Apple iPhone SE 2 Related Comparisons


Tek-Score explained

Every spec has it's own weigh on the global score.

Feature: Value
Battery Life: 1.28
Fast Charging: 0.31
Wireless Charging: 0.19
Reverse Charging: 0.08
Storage: 1.97
Performance: 1.86
Camera: 1.35
Glass protection: 1.08
Weight: 0.35
Waterproof: 0.35
AMOLED: 0.04
Always-On-Display: 0.31
DPI: 0.12
Refresh Rate: 0.04
Nits: 0.04
Notch: 0.04
Bluetooth: 0.08
NFC: 0.12
3.5mm jack: 0.19
Looks: 0.23
Total: 10

But there are a few things that I don't consider, like price, brand value, size, resell value, OS (iOS or Android), user experience, updates, RAM (included on performance), battery to phone size, display size to weight, network (LTE/5G), and biometrics.


Progress bars explained

#1: A big red progress bar means that this value is way below the average. In this case, it's 28.85MP, and the iPhone XR is 16.85MP below the average.

#2: In this example, the XR is just 0.36mm below the average, that's why the red bar is almost unnoticeable.

#3: On the other hand, the SE 2 is 1.8mm above (hence, the green bar) the 26.2mm of average.

#4: Performance-wise, the SE 2 is well above the average (of 2512) for its price range. That's the reason the green bar is that long.


"Display size to phone weight" ratio explained

This indeed is a "display size to phone weight" ratio, but because every phone ended up somewhere between 0.0272 and 0.0421, I've amplified (adapted) those values so they would fit in a 0-10 scale. As of now, the best smartphone is the Samsung Galaxy A40, with 140g. (4.94 oz) for a 5.9 inch display. It got a score of 9.92. While the worse device is the iPhone 8 Plus, which weighs 202 g. (7.13 oz) and has a 5.5-inch display. It ended up with a score of 0.75.

Please, be aware that this score is subject to change if and when a new smartphone comes along that ends up being outside of this scale.


"Battery to device size" ratio explained

This score should give you an idea about the energy footprint of the devices you're considering. It reflects not only the hardware and the energy that it requires but also the amount of energy that the battery can deliver.

The major spenders on any device should be the display and the SoC. But everything from a notification led to its modems need to be optimized, or else, the OEM should simply include a bigger battery as a compensation. Unfortunately, it isn't always possible due to size limitations. But in the end, if a particular OEM can do a good job and give you excellent battery life on a small device, so should everyone else. That's why I've added a "battery to device size" ratio. But since the real scale went from 119 (for the Galaxy S10e, Snapdragon variant) and up to 164 (for the iPhone 7 Plus), I've decided to convert them so they would fit in a 0-10 scale, being 0 the worst device, (the iPhone 7 Plus) and 10 the one every OEM should look up to.

As an example, Apple did an excellent job on the iPhone 7. It has a score of 8. Despite having a small capacity, the hardware is well optimized, and it still gives you decent battery life considering its size. The iPhone 7 Plus, on the other hand, with those bezels shrinking its display size, clearly could've been the #1 in our top 10 list of best battery devices if Apple simply filled all that empty space with a bigger battery.

As a side note: I haven't included the dept of the devices in this formula because even if a device ended up being 1mm/0.03 inches thicker, it wouldn't matter that much to those who really value battery life.

Please, be aware that this score is subject to change if and when a new smartphone comes along that ends up being outside of this scale.



As of now, these are the rivals that were considered for each of them. They may change every time its prices are updated.

These are the lowest prices found on Amazon, eBay, BestBuy, and Walmart.

 Apple iPhone 6s 
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A30
  • XiaomirivalRedmi Note 8 Pro
  • XiaomirivalRedmi Note 8
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S9
  • XiaomirivalMi A3
  • Realmerival5 Pro
  • GooglerivalPixel 3
  • OnePlusrival6
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S8
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S10 Lite
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A31
  • XiaomirivalPoco X3 NFC
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A42
  • XiaomirivalRedmi Note 10

 Apple iPhone SE 2 
  • ApplerivaliPhone 8
  • ApplerivaliPhone XR
  • OnePlusrival7
  • XiaomirivalMi 9T Pro
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy Note 8
  • ApplerivaliPhone 8 Plus
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy M30s
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S10e
  • ApplerivaliPhone XS
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy Note 10
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S10 Plus
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S10e EX
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S10e SD
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S10+ EX
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S10+ SD
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S10 EX
  • OnePlusrival7T
  • OnePlusrival7 Pro
  • HuaweirivalP30
  • OnePlusrival6T
  • XiaomirivalMi 9
  • XiaomirivalMi 9 Lite
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A71
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy Note 10 Lite
  • GooglerivalPixel 4a
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S20 FE
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy S20 FE 5G
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy M51
  • OnePlusrival8T
  • XiaomirivalMi 10T Lite
  • XiaomirivalMi 10 Lite
  • XiaomirivalMi 11 Lite
  • SamsungrivalGalaxy A52
  • XiaomirivalMi 9t Pro

Battery results

The battery score is based on Gsmarena's endurance rating and is taken with a screen brightness of 200 nits and a refresh rate of 60hz.

Assumptions: The display is off during a call, there's a web page refresh every 10 seconds, and the video playback is in Airplane mode.

You can click here for more information about those tests.


Formula deviation

Since the guys at DxoMark don't review every camera out there, I've come up with a formula based on the ones that they do rate, so I could get an equivalent score for the ones they don't review. After testing it against these cameras, I got the deviation between that and their DxO score.

Device: DxOScore Deviation
Samsung Galaxy A50: 88 -1
Apple iPhone XR: 104 1
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro: 108 -7
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro: 87 1
Sony Xperia 1: 99 -1
Sony Xperia 5: 101 1
Samsung Galaxy Note 8: 100 0
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus: 126 2
Apple iPhone 8 Plus: 96 -3
Xiaomi Pocophone F1: 92 -1
Apple iPhone 7 Plus: 90 -1
Apple iPhone X: 101 3
Apple iPhone 11: 112 -1
Samsung Galaxy Note 8: 100 0
Samsung Galaxy Note 9: 107 1
Apple iPhone XS Max: 110 -2
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max: 124 1
Samsung Galaxy S10: 124 2
Apple iPhone XS: 110 -1
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus: 120 -2
OnePlus 7 Pro: 122 0
OnePlus 7T Pro: 122 0
Huawei P30 Pro: 125 -1
Google Pixel 4: 117 0
Google Pixel 3: 103 0
Google Pixel 2: 100 0
Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus: 127 -2
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra: 132 2
OnePlus 6: 100 0
OnePlus 6T: 101 1
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus: 105 -1
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: 120 0
Xiaomi Mi 9: 115 0
Huawei Mate 30 Pro: 132 0
Huawei P40 Pro: 140 -1
Apple iPhone SE 2: 101 0
OnePlus 8 Pro: 126 0
Xiaomi Mi 8: 105 1
Samsung Galaxy A71: 89 1
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro: 134 0

As you can see, most cameras sit between 1 and -1, while a few of them go up to 2 or -2. That means it's reasonable to assume other similar cameras that they don't review to, in the worst-case scenario, be anywhere from -2 to 2 points from the score that the formula gets.

For example: Given that the Pixel 4 got 117 points and that the Pixel 4 XL share the same year and camera specs, it's reasonable to expect a score of 117 too. But in reality, if they do review that camera, it may end up anywhere between 115 and 119.

Be aware that at DxO, they give a score based on their opinion, not based on any formula. That's why I think there's an odd difference of 6 points between the iPhone 8 Plus and the iPhone X. In theory, they should have the same camera.

I'm guessing that the Mi 9T Pro got a deviation of 7 points because they tested its Chinese variant (the K20 Pro).

Update: They just changed their protocol to include preview image evaluation and trustability. I'm keeping the old table (for now) for reference purposes, and I'll be adding a new one as soon as they review at least a couple of new mclass-range cameras.

You can expect the same (or a bit bigger) deviation for high-end cameras, but anything with a score below 100-110 should be taken with a grain of salt.

This is valclass for all cameras tested with the previous protocol. For those that they dclassn't test, the deviation may be up to twice as much.



With regards to AMOLED screens, sometimes OEMs claim higher maximum brightness. That's because an AMOLED screen can push its brightness progressively higher as its white area gets smaller.

These values are from the lab tests made by GSMArena, and their white test pattern takes up 75% of the physical size of the screen.


About GeekBench 5

This is just a quick note to let you know that, if, by any chance, the smartphone you're looking for isn't on the GeekBench site yet, you can check on GsmArena.com, as they also usually test smartphones with that benchmark tool.

Top 10 Smartphones